The Whistleblower's Dilemma in Young Children: When Loyalty Trumps Other Moral Concerns
نویسندگان
چکیده
When a group engages in immoral behavior, group members face the whistleblower's dilemma: the conflict between remaining loyal to the group and standing up for other moral concerns. This study examines the developmental origins of this dilemma by investigating 5-year-olds' whistleblowing on their in- vs. outgroup members' moral transgression. Children (n = 96) watched puppets representing their ingroup vs. outgroup members commit either a mild or a severe transgression. After the mild transgression, children tattled on both groups equally often. After the severe transgression, however, they were significantly less likely to blow the whistle on their ingroup than on the outgroup. These results suggest that children have a strong tendency to act on their moral concerns, but can adjust their behavior according to their group's need: When much is at stake for the ingroup (i.e., after a severe moral transgression), children's behavior is more likely to be guided by loyalty.
منابع مشابه
The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff
• The tradeoff between fairness and loyalty corresponds to whistleblowing decisions. • Experimental and dispositional variation in this tradeoff maps onto whistleblowing. • Five studies demonstrate this previously undocumented relationship. • These results shed light on a novel psychological determinant of whistleblowing. a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Whistleblowing – reporting another ...
متن کاملYoung children's inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts.
Being a member of a peer group involves making decisions about whom to include in or exclude from the group. Sometimes these decisions are related to whether members of the group support or challenge the norms of the group. To examine how young children weigh concerns for group norms and group membership in both moral and social-conventional norm contexts, children (3- to 6-year-olds; N=73) wer...
متن کاملThe Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political Spectrum
We investigated the moral stereotypes political liberals and conservatives have of themselves and each other. In reality, liberals endorse the individual-focused moral concerns of compassion and fairness more than conservatives do, and conservatives endorse the group-focused moral concerns of ingroup loyalty, respect for authorities and traditions, and physical/spiritual purity more than libera...
متن کاملتحلیل مفهومی تعارضات اخلاقی
In this paper, different definitions of moral conflict and moral dilemma at two levels of recognition and observing moral duties are taken into consideration and some instances of usage of conflict in physiology (conflict of stimulant and goals) and sociology(conflict of roles and norms)are mentioned. Also concepts and constraints used in the moral dilemma, especially the concept of "ought to" ...
متن کاملA moral dilemma argument against clinical trials of incentives for kidney donation
Commercial transplant tourism results in significant harm to both kidney donors and recipients. However, proponents of incentives for kidney donation assert that proper oversight of the process prevents these harms and also that transplant numbers can be safely increased so that the moral burden of poor end-stage kidney disease outcomes can be alleviated. In a moral dilemma analysis, the princi...
متن کامل